Society


15
Sep 10

TEDxLaguna – John Moravec – Leapfrogging toward knowmad society

From TEDxLaguna:

John Moravec is a faculty member in the Innovation Studies and Master of Liberal Studies graduate programs and coordinator of the Leapfrog Institutes at the University of Minnesota. He is the principal of Education Futures LLC; a co-founder of the Horizon Forum, a roundtable on the future of education at all levels; and he is also the editor of Education Futures.

John is concerned about human capital development as society approaches an increasingly complex and ambiguous future. Technological change drives social change, and its impact is accelerating exponentially. Our schools, universities, and other institutions must leapfrog ahead of this curve for all people to compete in highly globalized, knowledge- and innovation-based societies. His work focuses on exploring this “New Paradigm” and the new approaches to leadership and human capital development required.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook


10
Sep 10

New Scientist: TV networks to become social networks

New Scientist predicts television will go massively social within five years:

“Some people think of TV viewing as a solitary experience. But, says Marie-José Montpetit at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who is developing an experimental social TV system called Nextream, ever since the birth of TV we have been talking to each other during broadcasts. And now we’re using online social networks in the same way. ‘The Twitter servers were brought down by the World Cup because people were exchanging views about it,’ she says.”

Read the full article at New Scientist.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook


17
Aug 10

Review: Education Nation (by Milton Chen)

Book: Education Nation: Six Leading Edges of Innovation in our Schools
Author: Milton Chen
Publisher: Jossey-Bass Teacher (July, 2010)

Like sunspots, books critical of the education system seem to follow periodic cycles. And, it seems we’ve hit a high point over the past year or so. We’ve seen popular books on the theme emerge from Clayton Christensen, Malcolm Gladwell, Sir Ken Robinson, and others.

Their messages are largely the same.

They converge on a genre that can only be classified as “change manifestos” — texts that are often written by educators (or people on the fringe of education) and suggest that we need a revolution in education. These, nearly universally, fail to tie in research, and lack a real future orientation. As a result, many of these change manifestos fail to help bring about meaningful change.

Milton Chen deviates from the change manifesto genre somewhat by reflecting on his own experiences and the work undertaken by Edutopia, which he previously directed. The book is so deeply oriented toward the work of Edutopia and its key source of income (George Lucas), that, prima facie, it nearly comes across as a swan song of their accomplishments. Reading beyond this, however, the book emerges as another list of indictments of many of the things wrong with the U.S. education system. Where Chen shines, is in making a case for changing our mindsets so that we can find remedies. Specifically, Chen writes that we need to focus on implementing six edges of “innovation”in K-12 learning — not all of which are mutually compatible:

  1. The thinking edge: We need to upgrade our thinking about education itself
  2. The curriculum edge: Modernizing what is taught, how, and how we assess learning
  3. The technology edge: Meaningfully bringing modern technologies into educational environments
  4. The time/place edge: Realizing that education occurs all the time, not just during school clock hours
  5. The co-teaching edge: Teachers are important, and bringing more experts into the classroom is beneficial
  6. The youth edge: Recognizing generational differences between students, educators, and society

These six edges are just fine, but let’s focus a little bit on semantics: I view innovation as the purposive application of imagination and creativity to produce new benefits, but the edges of “innovations” Chen covers are really frameworks for practitioners, policy makers, revolutionaries, et al, to think about making positive change. Moreover, most of these reframings have existed since the time of Dewey, making me wonder why they’re in a book about “innovation.” What Chen does well, however, is connect his six edges with research and stories — most of which was compiled from his arm’s length relationships with Edutopia and other researches in the San Francisco Bay Area. And, he uses these connections to build support for integrating project-based learning, cooperative teaching, proper technology integration, professional development, and other ideas — except they all emerged from the 20th century, not the 21st century. There are tomes of additional research available, nationally and internationally, that Chen could have folded into his book to make for a richer and deeper read — perhaps one relevant for the 21st century. But, this book is really the story of Edutopia.

And that’s just fine. Unless if you’re looking for innovation.

Whereas peaks in sunspot activity can have real consequences for people on Earth, peaks of change manifesto activity have generally lead to no real change. I have enormous respect for the work of Chen and Edutopia, but the casual rehashing of old themes with an “innovation” rebranding leaves the reader asking “how?” and “so what?” Unless if Chen can address these how and so what questions in a second volume or an update, I’m afraid this book will share space on my bookshelf with other change manifestos.

Bottom line: Chen’s Education Nation is an enjoyable read within its genre, but lacks new ideas.


Notes: 1) Thanks to Carmen Tschofen for introducing the term change manifestos to me to describe the genre discussed above. 2) Wiley provided a copy of this book for me to review.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook


28
Jul 10

Is the American Dream dead for Millennials?

The Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute’s “new deal 2.0″ asks, is the American Dream dead for the Millennial generation?

“At a Century Foundation presentation yesterday, four panelists told a group of college students the answer: an unequivocal ‘No.’ Hilary Doe, National Director of the Roosevelt Institute Campus Network, was joined by Greg Anrig, Vice President of Policy and Programs at TCF, Teresa Ghilarducci, the Bernard and Irene Schwartz Chair of Economic Policy Analysis at the New School, and Barbara Kiviat, a Staff Writer at Time Magazine. They teamed up to debunk myths about US debt, the economy, and prospects for the next generation.”

Read the full story at new deal 2.0.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook


27
Jul 10

Fair use: Essential for future culture generation

In light of the Library of Congress‘ decision to allow a number of exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, including jailbreaking (unlocking) iPhones, Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote an opinion piece for Read Write Web on the importance of protecting fair use rights is important for the future of a culture that relies more-and-more on media artifacts:

“It’s a value-added, remixed, platform-built economy these days. That’s a whole new channel opening up for innovation, the democratization of the economy and for revenue creation. Does it cannibalize the old economy? Not if the experience of two of history’s fastest-growing platform dynamos (iPhone and Facebook) are any indication. This digital economy could be called post-scarcity not because scarcity is no longer realistic or valuable, but because it’s no longer a precondition for the creation of value. In fact, scarcity may produce less total value in the future than the ecosystem of augmentation, annotation, remixing and fair use of the items formerly considered scarce will.”

Read the full article at Read Write Web.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook


27
Jul 10

40 years after Future Shock: NPR interviews Toffler

National Public Radio‘s All Things Considered spoke with Alvin Toffler on the 40th anniversary of the publication of Future Shock:

“So why be a futurist?

‘Because it makes you think,’ says Alvin Toffler. ‘It opens up the questions of what’s possible. Not necessarily what will be, but what’s possible.’”

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook